Blix Says He Saw Nothing to Prompt a War
By JUDITH MILLER and JULIA PRESTON
UNITED NATIONS, Jan. 30 — Days after delivering a broadly
negative report on Iraq's cooperation with international inspectors, and the
notion that time was running out for disarming Iraq through peaceful means.
In a two-hour interview in his United Nations offices overlooking Midtown
Manhattan, Mr. Blix, the chief chemical and biological weapons inspector, seemed
determined to dispel any impression that his report was intended to support the
administration's campaign to build world support for a war to disarm Saddam
"Whatever we say will be used by some," Mr. Blix said, adding that he
had strived to be "as factual and conscientious" as possible. "I
did not tailor my report to the political wishes or hopes in Baghdad or
Washington or any other place."
Mr. Blix took issue with what he said were Secretary of State Colin L. Powell's
claims that the inspectors had found that Iraqi officials were hiding and moving
illicit materials within and outside of Iraq to prevent their discovery. He said
that the inspectors had reported no such incidents.
Similarly, he said, he had not seen convincing evidence that Iraq was sending
weapons scientists to Syria, Jordan or any other country to prevent them from
being interviewed. Nor had he any reason to believe, as President Bush charged
in his State of the Union speech, that Iraqi agents were posing as scientists.
He further disputed the Bush administration's allegations that his inspection
agency might have been penetrated by Iraqi agents, and that sensitive
information might have been leaked to Baghdad, compromising the inspections.
Finally, he said, he had seen no persuasive indications of Iraqi ties to Al
Qaeda, which Mr. Bush also mentioned in his speech. "There are other states
where there appear to be stronger links," such as Afghanistan, Mr. Blix
said, noting that he had no intelligence reports on this issue. "It's bad
enough that Iraq may have weapons of mass destruction."
More broadly, he challenged President Bush's argument that military action is
needed to avoid the risk of a Sept. 11-style attack by terrorists wielding
nuclear, biological or chemical weapons. The world is far less dangerous today
than it was during the cold war, he said, when the Soviet Union and the United
States threatened each other with thousands of nuclear-tipped missiles. On
balance, "nuclear non-proliferation has been a success story," he
said. "The world has made great progress."
Mr. Blix said he continued to endorse disarmament through peaceful means.
"I think it would be terrible if this comes to an end by armed force, and I
wish for this process of disarmament through the peaceful avenue of
inspections," he said. "But I also know that diplomacy needs to be
backed by force sometimes, and inspections need to be backed by pressure."
The decision to disarm Iraq through force was not his, he said, restating what
has become a veritable mantra: It has to be decided by the "Security
Council, and yes, by Iraq."
Mr. Blix reiterated his report's key finding that Iraq had not provided anything
like the wholehearted cooperation he needed to certify that Saddam Hussein was
not concealing nuclear, biological or chemical weapons. His concern about Iraq's
attitude, he said, led him to refrain from explicitly asking for more time for
inspections when he reported to the Security Council on Monday.
"I haven't pleaded for continuing inspections because I haven't seen a
change of attitude on the part of Iraq," he said.
In the interview, Mr. Blix said that his examination of a liquid-filled warhead
that inspectors had discovered in a bunker on Jan. 16 found no signs of any
chemical weapons agent. The other 11 warheads found in the bunker were empty, he
said, adding that scores of samples his team had taken across Iraq in the past
two months had turned up "no trace" of either chemical or biological