Canada's
proposal for an Iraq solution
February 2003
Text of the
Canadian plan titled "Ideas on Bridging the Divide":
|
|
Purpose:
The following draws upon existing ideas in order to establish a defined process
for a specific period of time to address the Iraq situation.
Rationale:
Council division on such a crucial issue could have serious long-term
implications for the UN and for international peace and stability.
Both sides have a point:
The focus should be put
back on disarmament, on substance not on process, e.g. the disposition of the VX
gas and precursors, etc.
Iraq should be left in no
doubt exactly what is demanded of it on substance, not just on process, leaving
no "wiggle room."
Hence, the need for a
deadline for substantial co-operation, for example March 28, which would:
If Iraq persists in
evasion, the Council retains the right to act at any point.
If the March 28 inspection
report indicates that the Iraqis have not complied, all necessary means could be
used to force them to do so.
If Iraq co-operates, an
enhanced inspection, verification and monitoring system would be implemented.
Timetable and
Disarmament Requirements
February 28:
Inspectors bring forward their “clusters” report early and present it to the
Council setting out the key remaining disarmament issues/questions.
Inspectors present a
prioritization with timeframes for the Council of the key substantive tasks for
Iraq to accomplish, including those involving missiles/delivery systems,
chemical weapons/precursors, biological weapons/material and nuclear weapons.
March 7:
Inspectors update the Council on Iraqi co-operation on substance.
March 14:
Further update.
March 21:
Further update.
March 28:
Final report to the Council by inspectors.
March 31:
Meeting of the Council at ministerial level: